We read 'Outlook-based semantics' by Elizabeth Coppock. Below you can find the original abstract from the paper.

READING: Coppock, Elizabeth. “Outlook-based semantics” (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-017-9222-y

WHEN: Monday 31 May 2021, 15:00 - 16:30 (Amsterdam time)

ZOOM LINK: https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/87859202298

PDF: https://formal-semantics.github.io/download/coppock2018.pdf

DISCUSSION NOTES:

ABSTRACT:

This paper presents and advocates an approach to the semantics of opinion statements, including matters of personal taste and moral claims. In this framework, ‘outlook-based semantics’, the circumstances of evaluation are not composed of a possible world and a judge (as in ‘world-judge relativism’); rather, outlooks replace possible worlds in the role of circumstance of evaluation. Outlooks are refinements of worlds that settle not only matters of fact but also matters of opinion. Several virtues of the framework and advantages over existing implementations of worldjudge relativism are demonstrated in this paper. First, world-judge relativism does not actually explain the ‘disagreement’ of ‘faultless disagreement’, while a straightforward explanation suggests itself in outlook-based semantics. Second, outlook-based semantics provides an account of subjective attitude verbs that can capture lack of opinionatedness. Third, outlook-based semantics unproblematically explains the connection-building role of aesthetic discourse and the group-relevance of discretionary assertions, while capturing the same effects in world-judge relativism obviates the purpose of the judge parameter. Finally, because the proposed circumstances of evaluation (outlooks) are entirely analogous to possible worlds, the framework is easy to use and extend